it's been sometimes since I've posted, but yet I write about my anger.
sorry.
last nite was the men's single final badminton match in London olympics 2012.
Lin Dan (LD) vs. Lee Chong Wei (LCW)
at the end of the match, LD won.
LD and LCW had put up a great performance to show how much they wanted to bring the gold medal back.
the thing that I could not understand is, why do many people posted about 'LD is sooo arrogant', 'LD just won out of luck', and stuffs like that.
he won, because he has the skills to be a winner.
people keep saying LD is arrogant bla bla bla. he IS arrogant, but he has the skills that allow him to be arrogant.
does arrogant people do not deserve victory?
does he practice less than his opponent?
does he do not want the gold medal as much as his opponent does?
people please, put your point of view into both of them.
I admit that LCW had put up a lot of efforts to bring the gold medal back for his country, and I am sad to look at his face on the podium.
your complaints won't make the gold medal to be LCW's anyway.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
i agree with you completely. Yes, LD is arrogant but he deserves to be arrogant because he is really a very good player (I'm not saying our DLCW is not).
they both are a very good player, and last night match proved it :)
that's what you called being biased. every sports have fans like that, and there's no way to remove this element from sports. in fact this element is what makes sports so heated up no?
i just didn't think they would go as far as that. i thought they will only cheer one side during the competition. :/
hahahhaa, Lin Dan is indeed a bit cocky, and that's why opposition would always find reasons to heat up useless argument if he won (he did). He's the better player though, hats off to him.
Post a Comment